Let's Talk about Sex

Teachers crossing boundries

Since September, parents have noticed that too many teachers have been giving invasive questionnaires to students, asking about a student’s pronouns to lure children into conversation abound gender identity and sexual preference.

Sometimes teachers and school staff can lure your child into a conversation about their sexual preference without even saying a word. In Marlboro Schools, for example, parents complained that some Middle School teachers were wearing this NJEA-issued LGBT flag on their school lanyards, letting the kids know "I’M HERE".

“Here for what?” For sex? Because that’s what you are advertising on your body. This sign on an adult, in a middle or high school, just screams “sexual predator.”

I can’t tell if these teachers are just naïve or a deliberately wearing this lanyard for the sole purpose of “fishing” for middle kids to engage in a conversation about sex. This situation is a kid diddler’s dream, they get your frightened kid to approach them to have a conversation about sex… and guess what happens next?

These adults are under the impression that just because they are soliciting LGBT kids, that is somehow OK to engage them in a discussion about sex. Its not ok. It doesn’t matter what the sexual preference of the minor child is. Teachers SHOULD NOT ENGAGE CHILDREN IN SEXUAL DISCUSSIONS. PERIOD.

Stripping children of appropriate adult-child boundaries leaves kids ripe for abuse. About 93% of children who are victims of sexual abuse know their abuser and a typical pedophile will commit 117 sexual crimes in a lifetime. So why is the NJEA giving pedophiles a tool to find their victims? Why are schools encouraging inappropriate relationships between children and adults? Engaging kids about their sexual preference is only giving molesters access to kids. The schools already have a sexual abuse problem and now we are going to put kids in a situation to increase the number of victims? Don’t believe it? Check out the article from CBS below…

“You think the Catholic Church has a problem? The physical sexual abuse of students in schools is likely more than 100 times higher. - Charol Shakeshaft - Hofstra University researcher.

To make matters worse, the Superintendent in that District, Dr. Eric Hibbs, explained on record, in a Zoom call 2 weeks ago that if a minor-child speaks to the school staff about these topics, the school WILL NOT INFORM THE PARENTS. Click here to listen at 1:04:00

So how are you suppose to protect your child from engaging in sexual discussions with teachers, at that school, if you don’t know they are having this discussion?

Teachers and staff members SOLICITING are sex conversations with minor-children, then withhold information from the parents & guardians. Not safe, not safe not at all.

All these educators seem to think they are protecting these kids from their parents, when in actuality the parents need to be protecting their kids from sexual discussion with teachers. School staff just assumes that if your kid is gay or trans that a parent would reject them outright. This is 2022, that notion is absolutely absurd. Sometimes kids don’t know how a parent will react so they are unsure, but that doesn’t mean their fear is founded. So why in the world would we put kids at risk for sexual abuse under the false assumption that the parent is going to abandon their child?

This entire thing is creepy as all get out. Why is this permitted? You would never have an adult male teacher approach at 14 year old girl about sex conversations, so why in the world is it on for an adult make to do the same thing to boys just because they could be gay? Don’t gay teens deserve the same protection from predators that all the other kids get?

Signs like this don’t belong in school with minor children. Check out this sign below, what if it read this way?: “And if you don’t think your parents will accept you, I’m your daddy now. Come here and let me touch you. #freehugs”

---

What’s going on in your schools? Send me an email nstouffer@newjerseyproject.org