Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chris Hackett's avatar

Ignoring the staggering tax implications, One thing that did not make it into the article is that the this fractionalization de facto aids the NJEA. It is institutionalized "divide and conquer", with parents or other community stakeholders unable to form a unified front against a statewide monolith with the funding to push one set of goals. Each school district is a node for them; a forward base. For us, each district is a unique challenge with local politics taking precedent.

Keep in mind, before the State involved itself, school districts were entirely independent. This would have been even more "home rule" than we have now (as in the article, one Township had 11 districts serving 774 students). The problems started when desire for school home rule became conflated with local issues like road paving, train property access, etc. which led to the merging of the boro planning with school district planning. Before that law in 1894, boros were still rolled into the Townships plethora of districts, based on geography. After that law, made to incentivize borough creation, each borough that was formed got it's own school district along with its own municipality.

Expand full comment
Sharon Casey's avatar

Very interesting and informative. I have often wondered why all these school districts exist. Also explains why there are so many regional school districts.

Expand full comment
21 more comments...

No posts